Ethics

AI should be recognised as inventor, team insists

(c)iStock.com/BrianAJackson

An artificial intelligence system should be credited as the inventor of two ideas, according to the team which filed patents on its behalf – but it would mean patent law would need to be changed in the process.

DABUS, a machine architecture, has been given credit for designing a ‘fractal container’ (pdf) which is easy for robots to grasp, as well as a ‘neural flame’ (pdf) which attracts enhanced attention.

The Artificial Inventor Project has been put together to recognise the rule DABUS, a creativity machine – a particular type of artificial intelligence – played in the process. Patent attorneys from the University of Surrey, Williams Powell, Dennemeyer, Flashpoint IP and Fuchs IP filed the applications, while Stephen Thaler, an AI expert based in Missouri, created DABUS.

The team outlines its rationale. “Machines should not own patents,” it explains. “They do not have legal personality or independent rights, and cannot own property. The machine’s owner should be the default owner of any intellectual property it produces and any benefits that would otherwise subsist in an inventor who is a natural person.

“In the instant application, we submit that DABUS should be acknowledged as the inventor of any resultant patents, with the machine’s owner as the applicant and assignee of any such patents.”

Ryan Abbott, from the University of Surrey, told the BBC: “These days, you commonly have AIs writing books and taking pictures – but if you don’t have a traditional author, you cannot get copyright protection in the US. If AI is going to be how we’re inventing things in the future, the whole intellectual property system will fail to work.”

“It has been argued that a natural person may claim inventorship of an autonomous machine invention even in situations in which that person was not involved in the development or operation of a machine by virtue of recognising the relevance of a machine’s output,” the team adds in its patent applications page. “In some cases, recognition of the inventive nature of a computer’s output may require significant skill, but in others, the nature of inventive output may be obvious.

“In the present case, DABUS identified the novelty of its own idea before a natural person did.”

You can read the full analysis here.

Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this and their use cases? Attend the co-located AI & Big Data Expo events with upcoming shows in Silicon Valley, London, and Amsterdam to learn more. Co-located with the IoT Tech ExpoBlockchain Expo, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

To Top

We are using cookies on our website

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyse our traffic. Please confirm if you accept our tracking cookies. You are free to decline the tracking so you can continue to visit our website without any data sent to third-party services. All personal data can be deleted by visiting the Contact Us > Privacy Tools area of the website.